Posts Tagged ‘William Shatner’

Sulu goes raw online

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

There’s something special about George Takei calling someone a “douchebag”.

RELAX! AHH HA HA HAAA!

A lot of celebrities have spoken up lately for the U.S. elections, equal rights groups and such. Celebrity power has always been a powerful force that drives a message through the barrier of doubt into the wonderful world of acceptance.

If Sulu ever called Captain Kirk a douchebag, it would be a perfect fit to cast Takei for the video. I’m almost certain Takei has called William Shatner a douchebag (which would also be an amazing video to see).

It’s even great to see Takei say the word “Douchebag”. The fact that the man sought out by so many fans to be the intelligent, sophisticated man from his work says something that we would call the driver who can’t properly merge lanes is very respectable.

That’s why I’ve been coming up with a few good ideas for celebs to jump on the opportunity. Viola!

Doogs’ Top 5 Future Celebrity Endorsements
1. Arnold Schwarzenegger does an ad endorsing chamomile tea.
2. Keith Richards promotes safe climbing of coconut trees.
3. Justin Bieber promotes hair conditioner, and successfully does the ‘slo-mo’ flick.
4. Ellen and Justin Bieber holding hands to promote equal rights for all orientations. Bieber’s a chick, right?
5. John Woo makes a powerful presentation about saving doves just before any major gunfight.

Got any celebrities that would make an excellent promotion or be a good ambassador?


Check out CD WOW! on Facebook.
Check out CD WOW! on Twitter.
Join our RSS feed.

Taking the Bullock by the horns

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Sandra Bullock

What a flip-flop of achievements for Sandra Bullock.

She scooped up an Oscar for her work as the caring mother in The Blind Side as Best Actress, just after getting a Golden Raspberry (Razzie) for All About Steve as Worst Actress. And yet this contrast has still shown her to keep her humble grace on stage.

Whether this is a careful ploy to keep an image that non-celebrities can enjoy relating to, or she really is shocked and thankful to be where she is isn’t as important as the image she has as an actor that can take it on the chin (and also make out with Meryl Streep).

It’s brought up the question -- What’s more important: An actor who creates art with their talent, or someone you’d want to have a drink with?

Couldn’t an actor be left to do their piece of artistic beauty, then be hidden from the limelight?

No. It’s not how it works. If you’re good at what you do, people will seek you out. If you have soy coffees, someone out there wants to know. It’s all obsessive stalking behaviour, but until people see these strange obsessions as anything but necessary for our lives, the people paid lots of money to have fun in front of a camera will be hassled.

Best bring your biggest smiles for the flashing lights once you step out of your front door.

Here’s an example:

Nathan Fillion

5 Actors who are apparently “super, super nice”

  1. Johnny Depp
  2. George Clooney
  3. Nathan Fillion
  4. Katherine Heigl
  5. Hugh Jackman

5 Actors who are apparently also “bastards”

  1. Christian Bale
  2. Russell Crowe
  3. William Shatner
  4. Joaquin Phoenix
  5. Tobey Maguire

Does this change your opinion of the films they’ve been involved with? Does William Shatner ‘shatnering’ over his fans who have put him to his Godlike status make his Boston Legal work look less funny? Are you unchanged by Russell Crowe’s mobile phone throwing skills?

Here’s Sandra Bullock’s Razzies acceptance speech:


Check out CD WOW! on Facebook.
Check out CD WOW! on Twitter.
Join our RSS feed.

Stars and their critics

Monday, November 9th, 2009
Star Trek

Star Trek

I watched the remake of Star Trek last night, and I have to say that I really dug it. I’m sure the researchers on set would be pinpointing the exact specifications for every terminal and every LED light. I wonder how they found their reserachers? Imagine asking “Who’s the biggest fan?” at a Trekkie convention. Is it just me, or was Leonard Nimoy (Old Spock) in the film longer than Zachary Quinto (New Spock)?

I can see a lot of fans from the original disliking the new film, but this is the same sort of process that happened with Star Wars. In fact, it must have to do with galaxies in general.

The first three Star Wars films (Episodes 4, 5 and 6 for the younger crowd) remain a pinnacle of cinema for sci-fi fans. Watching them again, you get a sense of reliving that special moment that you felt a child. But relishing in this childhood memory can taint future projects. Imagine you loved going to a local amusement park when you were a kid, but you moved away to another city or country, and didn’t get to go back until you were a mature adult.

Upon returning to your old town, you find the amusement park still running, and the rides have been given a heavy dosage of funds and have been improved. That rickety wooden roller coaster that you thought would snap at any moment now has water fountains shooting at you as you ride down the adamantium steel tracks. The tiny bumper cars have been replaced with motorized go-karts, and the ferris wheel seems to have eaten its vegetables and grown twice the size. But you’re absolutely devastated that someone made changes to the place and ruined your childhood memories.

Jar Jar

Jar Jar Binks

Enter Star Wars: Episode 1.

This film was designed to be one of the three prequels leading up to the original films. George Lucas is a very, very wealthy man with a lot of wealth behind him, and now he can throw bags of money into special effects, costuming, sound, the works. You will struggle to find a hardcore fan of the original to like the first.

Star Wars was intended as an adventure in space that the whole family could enjoy, and was made with the intention of pleasing audiences young and old. Imagine the pressure faced with all those young fans, who have grown old and very, very sceptical of a new film.

Albeit some parts of the film could have improved (like the script), but a lot of people were missing the point of the Star Wars films: It was designed for kids too. Space, aliens, laser guns, everything appealed to kids. I remember pretending to use sticks as lightsabers. I bet you have the Lightsaber application on your iPhone.

The point is the dangers of remakes and continuation of old stories. People thought the fantastic upgrade of production value on the new Star Wars ruined the series. They thought Jar Jar was useless.

Actually, yeah I wasn’t the biggest fan either.

But you have to admit, the pod races were pretty awesome. I remember being in the cinema when it came out, and feeling the bass when Sebulba zoomed past with that heavy ‘Chug chug’ noise. I bet kids LOVED seeing that!

I never jumped into Star Trek to become a Trekkie, but I do know about the intensity of fans. I was like that with Firefly(…*sniff*). When you love something so much, anything new or different is considered less than equal automatically. Joss Whedon went on to make Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog and Dollhouse, which I’ve come to love dearly.

I’m not asking Star Trek fans to give up their love for the series, but to be hopeful of this passing of the baton. Have you compared the special effects between the two? Huge difference!

Heck, I’ve heard Shatner’s keen to be in the second film. That would be the ‘crème de la crème’ to let the old cast rest. Shatner was born for two roles: James T. Kirk, and Denny Crane.

“Damnit Jim! I’m a doctor, not a physicist!”
- Dr. McCoy